A Great Rebuttal

Jim Hill's Letter to Barbara Boxer
>
> Some of us witnessed the arrogance of Barbara Boxer (CA) as she
> admonished a brigadier general because he addressed her as "ma'am"
> and not "Senator" before a Senate hearing. This letter is from a
> National Guard aviator and Captain for Alaska Airlines. I wonder what
> he would have said if he were really angry. Long fly Alaska !!!!!
>
> To Senator Boxer:
>
> You were so right on when you scolded the general on TV for using the
> term "ma'am", instead of "Senator". After all, in the military,
> "ma'am" is a term of respect when addressing a female of superior
> rank or position. The general was totally wrong.. You are not a
> person of superior rank or position. You are a member of one of the
> world's most corrupt organizations, the U.S. Senate, equaled only by
> the U.S.. House of Representatives.
>
> Congress is a cesspool of liars, thieves, inside traders, traitors,
> drunks (one who killed a staffer, yet is still revered), criminals,
> and other low level swine who, as individuals (not all, but many),
> will do anything to enhance their lives, fortunes and power, all at
> the expense of the People of the United States and its Constitution,
> in order to be continually re-elected. Many democrats even want
> American troops killed by releasing photographs.. How many of you
> could honestly say, "We pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred
> honor"? None? One? Two?
>
> Your reaction to the general shows several things. First is your
> abysmal ignorance of all things military. Your treatment of the
> general shows you to be an elitist of the worst kind. When the
> general entered the military (as most of us who served) he wrote the
> government a blank check, offering his life to protect your derriere,
> now safely and comfortably ensconced in a 20 thousand dollar leather
> chair, paid for by the general's taxes. You repaid him for this by
> humiliating him in front of millions.
>
> Second is your puerile character, lack of sophistication, and
> arrogance which borders on the hubristic. This display of brattish
> behavior shows you to be a virago, termagant, harridan, nag, scold or
> shrew, unfit for your position, regardless of the support of the
> unwashed, uneducated masses who have made California into the
> laughing stock of the nation.
>
> What I am writing, Senator, are the same thoughts countless millions
> of Americans have toward Congress, but who lack the energy, ability
> or time to convey them. Under the democrats, some don't even have the
> 44 cents to buy the stamp. Regardless of their thoughts, most realize
> that politicians are pretty much the same, and will vote for the one
> who will bring home the most bacon, even if they do consider how
> corrupt that person is. Lord Acton (1834 - 1902) so aptly charged,
> "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
> Unbeknownst to you and your colleagues, "Mr. Power" has had his way
> with all of you, and we are all the worse for it.
>
> Finally Senator, I, too, have a title. It is "Right Wing Extremist
> Potential Terrorist Threat." It is not of my choosing, but was given
> to me by your Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano.
> And you were offended by "ma'am"?
>
> Have a fine day. Cheers!
>
> Jim Hill
> 16808 - 103rd Avenue Court East South Hill, WA 98374